Photo and notes provided by the user — not generated by AI
Submitted photo · June 23, 2026
User's notes
No additional notes provided.
AI analysis below
AI appraisal
AI analysis & estimate
AI-Generated · Verify before acting
Everything below is generated by AI for informational purposes only. AI can make mistakes — the AI may misidentify items or misattribute them (artist, maker, brand, designer, origin, era). This is not an official valuation and should not be used for insurance, sale, tax, estate, legal, or lending purposes — or any decision requiring a certified appraisal. It is not an authoritative claim about any person, brand, or rights holder — do not share or rely on it as a factual statement about a third party. Always consult qualified professionals before making financial decisions.
This is a United States postage stamp featuring the portrait of Gilbert Charles Stuart, the celebrated American painter. The stamp is a 1-cent denomination, indicated by the '1' mark in the lower left corner. The primary colors of the stamp appear to be a faded teal or blue-green for the central portrait and text, against an off-white or yellowish paper. The portrait of Gilbert Stuart is depicted in an oval frame, adorned with a wreath-like motif around its perimeter. Above the portrait, the text 'UNITED STATES POSTAGE' is prominently displayed in a rectangular block. Below the portrait, within a banner, reads 'GILBERT CHARLES STUART'. The stamp exhibits a perforated edge, typical of postage stamps, indicating it was separated from a sheet. A clear cancellation mark, consisting of several horizontal black lines, is visible across the face of the stamp, obscuring parts of the portrait and text. This cancellation suggests the stamp has been used. The paper appears slightly discolored or aged, consistent with an older stamp. The overall condition, besides the cancellation, seems to be relatively good with no immediately obvious tears or significant creases, though the image quality makes precise assessment challenging. The style suggests it belongs to an earlier series of U.S. postage stamps, likely from the early to mid-20th century, given its relatively simple design and use of a prominent historical figure.
AI Appraisal Report
·AI can make mistakes·Verify before acting
Based on my visual examination of the provided image, I have appraised this 1-cent Gilbert Charles Stuart U.S. Postage Stamp. The stamp appears to be a common regular issue from the Washington–Franklin Issue series, specifically the 1-cent green, likely Scott #331, #374, or a similar variation. The stamp is clearly cancelled with horizontal black lines, indicating it has been used. The paper shows signs of age and discoloration, but no obvious tears or significant creases are apparent from the image. The perforations seem intact.
From the image alone, I can confirm the stamp's denomination and the depicted figure. However, a definitive determination of the specific Scott catalog number, which is crucial for precise valuation, cannot be made without examining the watermark, perforation gauge, and paper type—details not discernible from the provided image. The presence of a clear cancellation significantly reduces its market value, as collectors generally prefer unused or lightly cancelled examples.
Market conditions for common, cancelled U.S. stamps of this era are generally low. Millions were printed and used, making them readily available. Comparables for a common cancelled 1-cent stamp in this condition typically range from a few cents to under a dollar. Demand for such items is primarily from beginner collectors or for completing basic albums, rather than high-end philatelists. Therefore, its rarity is minimal.
To fully authenticate and determine the exact Scott number and any finer points of condition that could affect value, a physical in-person examination is essential. This would allow me to check the perforation gauge, watermarks, paper type, and assess any imperceptible defects like thins, toning, or hidden creases. Provenance documentation could also support its history, but for such a common issue, it's rarely available or impactful on impact to price.