Ruby Flashed Diamond Point Cut Glass Vase

This item is a cylindrical glass vase featuring a prominent diamond point (hobnail-style) cut pattern across the body. The piece is constructed from clear flint glass with a distinctive 'ruby flashed' or 'stained' maroon-colored band around the upper rim. The geometry of the diamond cuts creates a refractive surface that enhances the brilliance of the glass when exposed to light. The rim is finished with a smooth, polished flat edge rather than a scalloped or saw-tooth design, which is common in mid-century glass production. Structurally, the vase tapers slightly toward a flat base. In terms of condition, the item appears to be in good vintage state without visible major chips or cracks in the photograph, though the ruby staining displays some slight thinning or minor scratches typical of age and use. Based on the deep relief of the pattern and the color application, this piece likely dates to the mid-20th century (circa 1940s-1970s). The craftsmanship indicates a commercial production of high quality, consistent with American or European manufacturers known for pressed and cut glass tableware. The contrast between the clear textured body and the bold red band serves as a significant decorative highlight.

I have examined the Ruby Flashed Diamond Point Cut Glass Vase. This piece, likely produced by an American manufacturer such as Indiana Glass or Anchor Hocking between 1950 and 1970, features a machine-pressed flint glass body with a secondary staining process. The condition appears consistent with vintage use; while the structural integrity is sound, the thinning of the 'ruby' flash at the rim is a common degradation point for this type of decorative treatment and slightly lowers the value. The market for mid-century pressed glass remains stable but saturated. Comparables for standard ruby-stained diamond patterns sell frequently in the $40 to $80 range depending on the size and intensity of the color. The primary value drivers for this item are the geometric brilliance of the cuts and the decorative appeal of the contrast band. However, as this was a mass-produced item rather than hand-blown lead crystal, rarity is low. Limitations of this appraisal include the inability to verify the glass composition (flint vs. lead) or detect internal heat cracks through photographs. For a definitive authentication, an in-person inspection to look for manufacturer marks (often sandblasted on the base) and a blacklight test to check for fluorescence (indicating specific chemical additives used in certain glass eras) would be required. No provenance documentation was provided, which limits the ability to tie the piece to a specific collectible glass house.