AI Appraisal Estimate

AI-generated estimates · not official valuations

From the user

What was submitted

Photo and notes provided by the user — not generated by AI

Submitted item photo
Submitted photo · June 16, 2026

User's notes

No additional notes provided.

AI analysis below

AI appraisal

AI analysis & estimate

AI-Generated · Verify before acting

Everything below is generated by AI for informational purposes only. AI can make mistakes — the AI may misidentify items or misattribute them (artist, maker, brand, designer, origin, era). This is not an official valuation and should not be used for insurance, sale, tax, estate, legal, or lending purposes — or any decision requiring a certified appraisal. It is not an authoritative claim about any person, brand, or rights holder — do not share or rely on it as a factual statement about a third party. Always consult qualified professionals before making financial decisions.

Read the full disclaimer

AI Identification

·Not independently authenticated·Verify before acting

1955 People's Republic of China (PRC) 10-Fen Brown Postage Stamp - Beijing Soviet Exhibition Center

Philately / Postage Stamps

AI Estimated Value

·Not an official valuation·Verify before acting

$5.00 - $12.00

As of June 16, 2026

AI Item Analysis

·AI can make mistakes·Verify before acting
This is a single postage stamp from the People’s Republic of China, issued in 1955. The stamp features an intaglio-printed architectural illustration of the Beijing Soviet Exhibition Center (currently the Beijing Exhibition Center), rendered in a monochromatic sepia/brown ink on off-white paper. The design prominently features the tower of the center topped with a red star and spire, a classic example of Stalinist architecture influential during that period. The denomination '10分' (10 Fen) is located in the upper left corner, while the bottom border contains the Chinese characters '中国人民邮政' (China People's Post). Physically, the stamp measures approximately 22mm by 26mm and features standard perforations. Notably, this specimen is in 'used' condition, evidenced by a partial circular black cancellation mark (postmark) on the left side, though the date and location are not fully legible. The condition shows minor issues typically associated with age and handling: the paper displays slight toning (yellowing), and there is some visual softening of the perforation teeth, particularly at the corners. There are no obvious tears or creases visible from the face, and the ink remains crisp with high-contrast fine lines characteristic of late 1950s Chinese engraving quality. This stamp represents the R10 'Architecture' definitive series, which highlighted newly constructed pride-of-state buildings in the early years of the PRC.

AI Appraisal Report

·AI can make mistakes·Verify before acting
I have virtually examined this 1955 PRC 10-Fen Brown stamp depicting the Beijing Soviet Exhibition Center, from the R10 definitive series. Based on the visual evidence, the stamp appears to be a genuine issue of the era. The intaglio printing exhibits the expected sharpness and fine-line detail characteristic of 1950s Chinese state engravings. However, as it is in 'used' condition with a partial cancellation, it lacks the premium value associated with mint, never-hinged specimens. The physical state shows typical age-related toning and softened perforations, which are standard for circulating mail of this period and do not severely detract from its modest collector value, though they do prevent it from reaching 'superb' grade status. Market demand for early PRC philately is currently high, especially for architectural themes; however, the 10-Fen R10 is a high-volume definitive rather than a rare commemorative issue, making it relatively common in the philatelic market. Comparable sales for single used specimens in this condition typically fall within the $5 to $12 range. It is important to note that a definitive authentication is impossible via digital imagery alone. A physical inspection would be required to verify paper thickness, detect hidden repairs (such as filled thins or regumming), and confirm the authenticity of the cancellation mark. For high-value portfolios, I would recommend checking for the presence of specific watermarks if applicable to the sub-series, though most R10s were printed on unwatermarked paper. Provenance regarding the original mailing envelope (postal history) would significantly enhance its historical value.

Get your items appraised

Instant estimates of your treasures with AI-powered appraisals

Browse More Appraisals