This is a pair of vintage decorative ashtrays cast in the form of traditional pointed-toe slippers or jutti, common in Indian and Middle Eastern decorative arts. Each item is constructed from solid yellow brass and measures approximately 3 to 4 inches in length. The exterior features a delicate hand-chased floral and foliate vine motif, characteristic of Anglo-Indian or Persian metalwork. The recessed areas of the pattern are filled with cold-painted enamel in shades of cobalt blue and hints of magenta or red, providing a high-contrast decorative finish. A distinctive rectangular indentation at the heel serves as a cigarette rest, identifying their function as ashtrays. The interior is unpolished, showing a dark, aged patina and rough casting marks. Evidence of wear is visible on the enamel surfaces, with some chipping and fading consistent with mid-20th-century vintage pieces. The brass exhibits a natural, uneven oxidation and verdigris, particularly on the lower shoe where the enamel has significantly darkened. No explicit maker's marks are visible on the top side, but such items were frequently produced as export ware between 1940 and 1970. The craftsmanship reflects a decent mass-produced quality from the period, utilizing traditional casting and manual etching techniques.

I have examined the provided images of this pair of brass slipper-form ashtrays. These pieces are characteristic of mid-20th-century Anglo-Indian or Middle Eastern 'bazaar' ware, produced primarily for the souvenir and export market between 1940 and 1960. The hand-chased floral motifs and cold-painted enamel inlay are consistent with period production methods. Based on visual inspection, the items show significant oxidation and notable enamel loss, particularly on the heel sections, which indicates regular use and common aging rather than high-end preservation. The market for small vintage brass tobacciana is stable but saturated. Comparable pairs typically sell in the $40 to $70 range at retail or online vintage marketplaces. Their value is driven by their decorative appeal as 'Boho' or 'Global' decor rather than rarity or precious metal content. The lack of a visible 'India' or 'Made in...' stamp suggests these may be earlier examples within that mid-century window, though it does not significantly increase the market value given the mass-produced nature of these souvenirs. My assessment is limited to visual data. A physical inspection would be required to verify the exact metal composition and to check for hidden makers' marks on the underside with a loupe. To fully authenticate the age, I would need to observe the wear on the contact points of the soles for authentic friction patterns. Without provenance or original packaging, they remain categorized as decorative vintage collectibles. Scientific testing is generally not cost-effective for items of this valuation level.