Studio pottery lidded vessel in the style of Hannah Scott

This ceramic item is a small, wheel-thrown lidded vessel, potentially a salt cellar or a trinket box. The piece features a deep, well-like interior with a flared rim and a matching domed lid. The glaze appears to be a variegated metallic or dark iridescent finish, showing hints of purple, grey, and silver tones with a subtle sheen that is stylistically consistent with modern studio pottery techniques. The interior of the bowl shows concentric throwing lines, suggesting hand-crafted construction. The user attributes this piece to potter Hannah Scott; however, no signature, stamp, or maker's mark is visible in the provided image to verify this claim. The identification remains a hypothesis based on user input and general stylistic features. The craftsmanship appears robust, with visible glaze pooling and textural variations typical of artisanal stoneware. The condition seems good from the top-down perspective, with no apparent large chips or cracks, though reflections on the glossy lid may obscure fine surface wear or crazing. This piece appears to be a contemporary or late 20th-century work of functional art.

I have examined the images of this wheel-thrown lidded vessel. Based on what I can see, the piece displays a high level of artisanal skill, featuring a variegated metallic glaze with an iridescent sheen and concentric throwing marks characteristic of contemporary studio stoneware. Per user submission, the piece is attributed to potter Hannah Scott; however, no signature or potter's mark is visible in the provided views. Consequently, I must treat this attribution as a hypothesis that I cannot verify from a photo alone. The estimate of $60 - $120 reflects the typical market value for a functional work of this quality assuming the attribution to Scott is accurate. Demand for contemporary studio pottery remains stable, with collectors specifically seeking out the textural and glaze-driven aesthetics seen here. If the piece were physically inspected and found to be unsigned or by an unidentifiable maker, the value would likely decrease to a decorative range of $25 - $45. Conversely, if it bears a mark consistent with the attributed potter, it would sit at the higher end of the estimate. To move beyond a working assumption, a physical examination of the base for a stamp and a review of the item's provenance would be necessary. Condition appears good, though I cannot rule out fine crazing or minor surface wear without an in-person inspection.