AI identification & appraisal estimate

Paleolithic Biface Lithic Tool (Scraper/Hand Axe)

Submitted photo of Paleolithic Biface Lithic Tool (Scraper/Hand Axe)
Photo submitted by the user — not generated by AI

User's notes

Paleolithic Acheulean Bi face hand axe scraper tool found in Guthrie OK measuring 2.75 x 1.75

These notes were written by the person who submitted this item. Appraiser.AI has not verified them, and the AI's identification and estimate may rely on them.

AI Estimated Value

Not an official valuation

$45–$85

AI estimate as of February 23, 2026 · verify with a professional before acting

AI-Generated · Verify before acting

Everything on this page is generated by AI for informational purposes only. AI can make mistakes — the AI may misidentify items or misattribute them (artist, maker, brand, designer, origin, era). This is not an official valuation and should not be used for insurance, sale, tax, estate, legal, or lending purposes — or any decision requiring a certified appraisal. It is not an authoritative claim about any person, brand, or rights holder — do not share or rely on it as a factual statement about a third party. Always consult qualified professionals before making financial decisions.

This analysis also relies on unverified notes provided by the user, which may be incomplete or inaccurate and could affect the result.

Read the full disclaimer

AI Item Analysis

This is a small, bifacially worked lithic tool, measuring approximately 2.75 inches by 1.75 inches, originating from Guthrie, Oklahoma. The artifact is crafted from a high-quality chert or flint material, exhibiting a complex color palette that includes tan, cream, and ochre-yellow hues. The physical construction shows evidence of percussion flaking, resulting in a rugged, textured surface typical of prehistoric stone tool manufacturing. As a biface, it has been worked on both sides to create a functional edge, although the morphology suggests it may have served more effectively as a side-scraper or a small hand-held chopping tool rather than a traditional elongated hand axe. The object displays a heavy natural patina and calcification of the surface, indicating significant age and exposure to the elements over millennia. There is visible smoothing on the higher ridges of the flaked surfaces, which may be a combination of ancient water-wear (alluvial action) and intentional use-wear from processing materials. While the user identifies it as Acheulean, the location in North America suggests it would technically fall into a different cultural categorization, likely Paleo-Indian or Archaic period, as Acheulean technology is traditionally associated with Afro-Eurasian Lower Paleolithic sites. The piece shows no modern breaks, maintaining its original knapped integrity with softened, weathered edges that prove its authenticity as a prehistoric utility tool.

AI Appraisal Report

Based on my visual examination of this lithic biface from Guthrie, Oklahoma, I have assessed its physical characteristics and market standing. The item shows authentic signs of antiquity, characterized by a well-developed patina, surface calcification, and 'river-wear' smoothing on the flake ridges. This indicates the piece has been exposed to environmental minerals and potentially alluvial action for several millennia. While the user identifies this as 'Acheulean,' that terminology refers to a specific Lower Paleolithic technology found in Africa and Eurasia. For a North American find, this specimen is more accurately classified as a Paleo-Indian or Archaic period biface. Its morphology—broad and relatively thick—suggests a utilitarian existence as a side-scraper or multi-tool rather than a formalized projectile point. The material (a high-quality variegated chert) is aesthetically pleasing, which helps its retail appeal. However, the market for lithic 'debitage' or generalized bifacial scrapers is quite saturated. Unlike fluted Clovis points or highly specialized ceremonial blades, common lithic tools command modest prices. The value is capped by its lack of a formal cultural 'type' classification. Crucially, I must state that this assessment is based solely on digital images. A definitive valuation and authentication require physical inspection to rule out modern lapidary replication or modern 'tumbled' weathering. For full authentication, I would require documented provenance including the specific site location (GPS or plot) and any associated geological context. This report serves as an estimate of fair market value for a genuine artifact of this class; it does not constitute a certificate of authenticity.

Keep exploring

More prehistoric artifacts / lithic tools appraisals

Get your items appraised

Instant AI-powered appraisal estimates from a photo

Browse More Appraisals