Pressed flower resin pendant

This is an oval pendant featuring a botanical specimen encased in a dark blue, possibly resin or glass, cabochon. The central element is a pressed white flower, resembling Queen Anne's lace or a similar umbellifer, preserved against a deep blue background. The cabochon is set within a decorative silver-tone metal mounting that showcases intricate filigree work with open scroll and loop patterns along the scalloped border. A fixed bail is attached to the upper left edge of the pendant to accommodate a chain. The metal displays a shiny finish with minor signs of handling and light surface wear. There are no visible maker's marks or hallmarks apparent from the visible angle. The piece stylistically references Victorian or mid-century botanical revival jewelry designs, though its exact age and material composition remain unverified without physical testing.

Based on what I can see in the photograph, this oval pendant features a botanical specimen encased in a dark blue cabochon, set within a decorative silver-tone metal mounting with intricate filigree work. I can't verify from a photo the exact material composition of the metal, whether the cabochon is resin or glass, or the true age of the piece, as would need physical inspection to confirm. The piece stylistically references Victorian or mid-century botanical revival jewelry, and my value estimate assumes a vintage costume jewelry attribution consistent with this style. General market demand for botanical revival and vintage-style costume jewelry remains steady among collectors of accessible decorative accessories. The estimated value range of $45-75 reflects typical market behavior for items of this type in similar condition with light surface wear. However, if physical examination reveals the piece to be a modern reproduction, replica, or mass-produced copy rather than a vintage item, the value would likely decrease to the $15-30 range. To establish a more precise evaluation and to confirm material composition, age, and potential maker attribution, in-person examination, hallmark verification, and expert appraisal would be necessary.