Floral Print signed illegibly (not authenticated)

This is a framed color print depicting a botanical study of various irises in shades of deep purple, violet, yellow, and blue, surrounded by long green foliage against a dark, moody background. The artwork appears to be a reproduction print on paper, featuring a white border around the central image. In the lower left corner of the white margin, there is a visible pencil notation that appears to read an edition number, though it is partially obscured or ambiguous. In the lower right margin, there is a handwritten pencil signature that is stylized and largely illegible, consisting of looping cursive strokes. The item is encased in a simple frame with a visible textured, beaded or carved inner molding detail along the bottom edge, though the full frame is not entirely shown. The overall visual evidence suggests a modern decorative print, likely produced in the late 20th century, though exact age and printing technique remain unverified due to the glass covering and lack of physical inspection. The attribution in the name rests solely on the presence of the visible handwritten signature in the lower right margin, which has not been matched to any specific artist. No maker's marks or publisher stamps are immediately discernible within the visible areas. The physical condition appears generally clean with no obvious fading or water damage visible through the protective glass, but the item is unauthenticated.

Based on what I can see in the provided image, this framed color print depicts a botanical study of irises with a stylized, illegible signature in the lower right margin and a partial pencil notation in the lower left. I cannot verify from a photo the exact printing technique, age, paper quality, or the true identity of the artist, as visible markings can be misleading or unverified. The attribution remains a working hypothesis based solely on the presence of the handwritten signature, which has not been definitively matched to a specific maker. The physical condition appears clean through the protective glass, but I would need physical inspection to confirm the medium and rule out modern mass-produced offset lithography. The estimate of $50-$150 reflects general market demand for decorative late 20th-century botanical prints of this type. If the piece is determined to be a standard decorative reproduction or unattributed print rather than a limited-edition work by a sought-after hand, the value would likely sit at the lower end of this range or below. To confirm authenticity and solidify the value, the item would require in-person examination by a fine art expert, a thorough search for publisher stamps, and provenance documentation. As it stands unauthenticated, the current value is speculative and dependent upon a favorable future review.