AI Appraisal Estimate

This item is a counterfeit Pokemon Trading Card Game card depicting Glaceon ex with a 'Tera' (Terastal) typing. The card measures standard TCG dimensions (approximately 2.5 by 3.5 inches) and is constructed from cardstock with a simulated holographic finish. The artwork features a crystalline, faceted Glaceon consistent with the Scarlet & Violet era design aesthetic, using a vibrant blue, teal, and rainbow color palette. Notable features include a 270 HP stat, 'Frost Bullet' and 'Euclase' attacks, and an unusual 'H PRE EN 026/131' set identifier. Crucially, the card also displays a '©2025' copyright date, which is ahead of actual production at the time of this assessment, confirming its status as a non-official/counterfeit product. The card shows minor signs of wear around the edges (whitening) and lacks the specific texture patterns and high-quality printing found on genuine 'Ultra Rare' holographic cards produced by The Pokemon Company International. The font and spacing in the text fields deviate slightly from official brand standards.

Upon visual examination of this Glaceon ex Tera card, I have identified it as a counterfeit product. The most definitive evidence is the '©2025' copyright stamp, which predates legitimate Pokémon Company production for this era. Furthermore, the card lacks the complex, fingerprint-like surface etching (texture) required for authentic Terastalized 'ex' cards from the Scarlet & Violet series. The simulated holographic sheen appears flat, and the set numbering ('H PRE EN 026/131') does not correspond to any official release. The minor whitening on the edges confirms the use of lower-quality cardstock compared to standard TCG core. In the current market, counterfeit cards hold no value for serious collectors or competitive players, as they are prohibited in official play and lack the scarcity of genuine Ultra Rares. While authentic Glaceon ex cards are sought after by character collectors, non-official reproductions are considered 'bulk' or novelty items with negligible resale potential. My assessment is based on high-resolution imagery; however, a physical inspection would typically involve a light test to check opacity and a microscopic examination of the 'rosette' printing pattern to differentiate between inkjet-printed counterfeits and official offset-lithography. No further scientific testing is required here, as the illogical copyright date and incorrect set identifiers provide conclusive proof of its non-authentic status.