AI Appraisal Estimate

A pair of circular button-style earrings featuring a complex openwork filigree design. Each earring is composed of a gold-tone metallic base with an intricate arrangement of five-petaled floral motifs. These flowers are decorated with contrasting enamel-like finishes in cream and black, alongside small clear faceted stones that appear to be rhinestones or crystals. The construction appears to be cast metal. Stylistically, the earrings are consistent with contemporary fashion or costume jewelry, though a specific brand or maker cannot be identified as no hallmarks or signatures are visible in the image. The user provides the context that these are 'Earrings', which is consistent with the visual evidence of the matched pair. The overall condition appears used but intact, with some minor visible surface wear to the gold-tone plating and enamel sections. Without physical inspection of the reverse side for a maker’s mark, these items are attributed solely on their aesthetic characteristics. Dimensions and metal purity are unverified.

Based on the image provided, these are circular button-style earrings featuring a gold-tone openwork filigree design with floral motifs. The construction appears to be cast metal decorated with cream and black enamel finishes and small faceted stones. Based on what I can see, the materials appear to be base metal and synthetic stones rather than precious metals or gems, aligning them with contemporary costume jewelry. Since no hallmarks or signatures are visible in the photo, I am treating any attribution as a hypothesis; these appear to be unsigned fashion pieces. I cannot verify the metal purity or stone composition from a photograph, and a physical inspection would be required to rule out the presence of a hidden maker's mark on the reverse. The estimate of $15–$45 reflects the current secondary market demand for unsigned costume jewelry in used but intact condition. The presence of surface wear and potential plating loss slightly reduces the value. Market interest for items of this type is generally driven by aesthetic appeal rather than brand name. If a high-end designer signature consistent with brands like Monet or Trifari were discovered upon closer inspection, the value could increase to $60–$100. Conversely, if the enamel is found to be significantly chipped or the stones are missing—details hard to confirm without a loupe—the value would likely fall below $10. To increase confidence in this estimate, an in-person examination to verify the weight, material coldness, and reverse-side construction would be necessary.