Vintage Red Textured Dome Button

This item is a circular, domed button featuring a vibrant reddish-pink or cherry red color. It is characterized by its distinctive repeating scale or 'honeycomb' surface pattern, where small indented oval shapes create a consistent geometric texture across the entire convex face. The button appears to be made from a molded synthetic material, likely a vintage plastic such as Lucite, Bakelite, or a high-density polyester resin commonly used in mid-20th-century garment manufacturing. Its design suggests a mid-century modern aesthetic, likely dating from the 1950s to the 1970s. The surface shows minor signs of aging, including faint micro-scratches and slight dullness in the finish, which is typical for a used vintage fastener. There are no immediate maker's marks visible on the front face, and the back is not shown, though it would typically feature a shank or sew-through holes. The craftsmanship is uniform, indicating a mass-produced but high-quality industrial fashion component intended for heavy coats or statement knitwear.

I have conducted a visual examination of the vintage red textured dome button, a classic example of mid-century sewing notions. The item features a distinctive scale or 'honeycomb' molded pattern on a cherry red convex face. Based on the uniform texture and surface wear, the material is likely a molded polyester resin or thermoset plastic common between 1950 and 1970. The condition is 'Good-Vintage,' showing expected micro-scratches and slight oxidation of the finish consistent with use on a heavy garment. The market for individual vintage buttons is highly saturated. Comparables for non-designer, mass-produced plastic buttons in this size typically sell within the $3.00 to $10.00 range. Rarity is low, as these were produced in high volumes for industrially manufactured coats and knitwear. Value is primarily driven by color and pattern appeal for craft repair or 'slow fashion' restoration rather than investment-grade collectibility. Significantly, several factors cannot be determined from this visual inspection. I cannot verify the material via a Hot Needle or Simichrome test to confirm if it is Bakelite, which would increase the value to $15-$20. Furthermore, the absence of a view of the reverse side prevents me from assessing the shank integrity or identifying potential maker's marks. For a conclusive authentication, a physical examination to determine weight, sound (the 'clack' test), and a chemical analysis of the polymer would be required. Provenance documentation regarding the original garment would also assist in more precise dating.