Four-Arm Figural Metal Candelabra Appraisal

Category: Decorative Object

Four-Arm Figural Metal Candelabra

Description

This item is a figural bronze or brass four-arm candelabra featuring a decorative base and stem. The base is rectangular with rounded corners and is adorned with scrolling motifs and what appears to be animal paw feet. The stem is sculpted in the form of a draped female figure holding a torch-like element, from which the four arms extend. Each arm is curved and terminates in a stylized flower-like bobeche designed to hold a candle. The material appears to be a cast metal, likely bronze or brass, with a dark, aged patina and areas of lighter, polished metal revealing the material beneath. There are visible signs of age and use, including areas of tarnish and wear on the surface, particularly on the raised elements and edges. The overall style suggests a 19th or early 20th century revival or antique production, possibly in the Rococo Revival or similarly ornate style. The casting exhibits moderate detail, and the joins between the components appear to be secure, although closer inspection would be required to assess the construction method (e.g., soldering, bolting). No visible manufacturer's marks or signatures are apparent in the image. The piece demonstrates reasonable craftsmanship for its style and likely age, though it does not appear to be a high-end example of its type. The patina indicates a natural aging process rather than artificial aging.

Appraisal Report

Based on my visual examination of the provided image, this Four-Arm Figural Metal Candelabra appears to be a decorative piece likely dating to the late 19th or early 20th century, styled in line with Rococo Revival period aesthetics. The material seems to be cast bronze or brass, exhibiting a dark, aged patina consistent with natural aging. Condition appears fair, with expected surface wear, tarnish, and potential minor casting imperfections visible. The figural element, while present, lacks the fine detail and sculptural depth typically found in high-end examples. Authenticity, based on the visual representation, appears plausible for the period and style; however, definitive verification of material, casting technique, and age would require in-hand examination. I was unable to locate any maker's marks or signatures from the image, which is a common limitation of visual inspection. Market conditions for decorative metalware of this style are moderate. Examples of comparable quality and period without prominent maker identification typically sell in the mid-range. Demand is relatively stable but not indicative of high rarity. Factors impacting value include the attractive form, the apparent solid construction, and the appealing patina. The lack of provenance, maker's mark, and the visible but not exceptional craftsmanship prevent it from reaching higher values. For full authentication and a more precise value assessment, I would recommend physical inspection to evaluate weight, casting quality, construction methods (e.g., internal structure, joinery), undertake material testing if necessary, and conduct a thorough search for hidden marks. Provenance documentation would also significantly aid in establishing authenticity and history. Based solely on what is discernible from the image, I estimate the value as noted.

Appraisal Value

$150-250